2 October 2024

What is the difference between a Progressive Web App (PWA) and a mobile application?

The debate between PWA vs native app continues to shape how businesses approach mobile development. While both solutions can deliver engaging user experiences, understanding the core differences will help you make better decisions for your project. Let's explore what sets progressive web apps apart from traditional mobile applications and when each approach makes the most sense.

The cover image of the blog

Understanding Progressive Web Apps

Progressive Web Apps represent a modern approach to web development that bridges the gap between websites and mobile applications. Unlike traditional web pages, a progressive web app can work offline, send push notifications, and feel almost identical to a native mobile experience. They're built using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, but are enhanced with modern APIs that give them app-like capabilities and feel.

The main advantage of a progressive mobile app lies in the fact that it is universally compatible. This means that whether your users access it through Chrome on Android or Safari on iOS, the experience remains the same. Thanks to this cross-platform nature, you do not need to maintain separate codebases for different operating systems, which helps reduce development costs and time to market.

The Traditional Mobile App Approach

Native mobile applications are built using languages and frameworks that are created for specific operating systems. iOS apps use Swift or Objective-C, while Android apps typically use Java or Kotlin. This approach allows developers to have complete access to device features and often delivers the smoothest performance possible.

The trade-off comes in complexity and cost. When you choose native development, you're essentially building two or more separate applications to cover different platforms. Each version needs its own development team, testing process, and maintenance schedule. However, this investment often pays off when your application needs deep integration with device hardware or when performance is absolutely critical.

Performance: Where Each Solution Shines

When comparing mobile app vs PWA performance, the picture isn't as straightforward as many would assume. Native apps traditionally held a clear advantage because they could tap directly into device resources without the overhead of a browser. For graphics-intensive applications like games or complex data visualization tools, this direct access still makes a noticeable difference.

This being said, modern progressive web apps have closed much of this performance gap. Browser engines have become incredibly efficient, and new web APIs provide access to device features that used to be exclusive to native apps. For most business applications, content management systems, and e-commerce platforms, users probably won’t notice any performance differences between well-built PWAs and native apps.

The real performance advantage of progressive web apps often comes from the way they get updated. While native mobile apps require users to download and install updates through app stores, PWAs update automatically in the background. This means users always access the latest version without any friction, which can actually improve the overall user experience even if raw performance is slightly lower.

Development Complexity and Cost Considerations

The difference between PWA and native app development extends far beyond just the coding process. Native app development requires specialized knowledge for each platform, which often means larger development teams and longer project timelines. You need iOS developers who understand the intricacies of Apple's ecosystem, Android developers familiar with Google's platform requirements, and often separate designers who understand each platform's unique interface patterns.

Progressive web apps simplify this equation considerably. A single development team can build a PWA that works across all platforms. The skills required overlap with traditional web development, making it easier to find qualified developers and maintain the application over time. This doesn't mean PWA development is simple, but it does mean you're dealing with one technology stack instead of multiple specialized ones.

This is the same with the cost implications, which also extend beyond initial development. Native apps require ongoing maintenance for each platform, separate app store management, and often different feature rollout schedules. With PWAs, you do not have to deal with these concerns, but you will have to handle the complexities of ensuring everything runs consistently on different browsers and devices.

App Store Strategy and Discovery

One of the biggest differences lies in how users discover and install these applications. Native apps live within the app store ecosystems, benefiting from search algorithms, featured placement opportunities, and the trust that comes with app store vetting processes. For many businesses, having their apps visible on app stores works as a marketing channel and is a way to drive organic user acquisition. But it can also be a challenge for others whose products are drowned in the sea of applications.

Progressive web apps take a different approach to discovery. They can be found through traditional web search, shared via simple URLs, and installed directly from websites without going through an app store. This flexibility can be incredibly valuable for businesses that want to maintain control over their user acquisition funnel or need to deploy updates quickly without waiting for app store approval.

This being said, the lines are beginning to blur here as well. Many progressive web apps can now be submitted to app stores, giving you the best of both worlds. Microsoft's Store accepts PWAs directly, and Google Play allows PWA submission through tools like PWA Builder. Apple is still a bit more restrictive, but PWAs can still be added to the home screen and behave like native apps on iOS devices.

User Experience Expectations

The question of native vs hybrid vs PWA often comes down to what users expect and how they use the apps. With time, users have developed some level of expectation when it comes to how apps should behave and look. Native apps can match these expectations perfectly because they're built using the same interface components that users encounter in other native apps.

Progressive web apps have to work harder to meet these expectations, but modern frameworks and careful attention to platform-specific design patterns can create experiences that feel genuinely native. The key is understanding that users don't care about the underlying technology; they care about whether the app helps them accomplish their goals in a way that is efficient and enjoyable.

For progressive phone apps, the challenge becomes even more interesting because phone-specific features like camera access, GPS, and push notifications need to work seamlessly. Modern PWA capabilities have made significant strides here, but there are still scenarios where native apps provide more reliable access to advanced device features.

Offline Functionality and Data Management

How applications work offline shows another important distinction between these approaches. Native apps can cache data and functionality locally, allowing users to continue working even without internet connectivity. They can also implement background sync mechanisms that update data when the connection is back.

Progressive web apps can offer comparable offline capabilities using service workers, which serve as customizable proxy servers connecting your app to the network. This technology allows PWAs to store resources, catch network requests, and deliver offline experiences. Although they are quite effective, service workers need to be implemented with care to guarantee they function consistently across various browsers and situations.

The data management story also differs a lot. While native apps can store data locally using platform-optimized databases and sync mechanisms, PWAs rely on web-based storage options like IndexedDB. These solutions are capable but sometimes less predictable, depending on the browser and device.

Making the Right Choice for Your Project

When deciding between a progressive mobile application and a native app, start by examining your specific requirements rather than following industry trends. Consider your target audience's technical sophistication, device preferences, and usage patterns. A progressive app for Android might make perfect sense for a business targeting tech-savvy users who value instant access and seamless updates.

Budget and timeline constraints play a crucial role in this decision. If you need to reach multiple platforms quickly and have limited development resources, PWAs offer compelling advantages. The ability to maintain a single codebase while delivering cross-platform experiences can accelerate your time to market significantly.

However, if your application needs deep device integration, maximum performance, or needs to feel completely native to succeed, traditional mobile app development might be worth the additional investment. Applications that rely heavily on advanced camera features, complex animations, or platform-specific interface patterns often benefit from native development.

The Hybrid Approach: Getting the Best of Both Worlds

A lot of successful companies don’t view this as a black-and-white choice. They might start with a PWA to check market interest and collect user feedback, then invest in native apps for specific platforms where the user base justifies the extra development effort. This step-by-step method lets you test your ideas with less risk before diving into more expensive native development.

Another hybrid strategy involves using PWAs for certain user segments while offering native apps for power users who need advanced features. LinkedIn, for example, offers both a capable PWA for casual users and full-featured native apps for users who need offline access and advanced functionality.

The Path Forward

As web technologies evolve and development tools get better, the line separating progressive web apps from native mobile applications continues to blur. Google's Project Fugu aims to enhance web apps with native-like functionalities by regularly adding new APIs that help close the gap between web and native experiences.

In the meantime, native development keeps advancing with new frameworks, upgraded development tools, and more effective cross-platform solutions. The decision between these approaches is likely to be less about technical barriers and more about business strategy, user expectations, and the abilities of the development team.

Whether you choose PWAs, native apps, or a hybrid approach, success comes down to execution and understanding your users' real needs. The technology is just the foundation; what matters is building something people actually want to use.

*Learn even more about app development with our comprehensive guide on mastering web and mobile applications. *